What this means in real terms is that multi-award-winning actress Kate Winslet, in all her elegance and regal glory, may actually be at the same event where girl-gone-wild Lindsay Lohan is stumbling around in the bathroom and Britney Spears is acting like a crazy person (again). And of course, Kate may say hello to Lindsay and Britney because they know each other by virtue of being at the same exclusive events, even if they have nothing else in common and have never (and will never, to be clear) co starred in a movie or sung a duet. Contrast this with the non celebrity world: Most people with a predilection for hard partying and bad behavior aren’t likely to be running in the same circles as reserved, refined people like my mother. What makes celebrity networks so different from ours is that everyone attends the same events and knows the same people. Additionally, most celebrities’ friends tend to be connected to one another, by virtue of ending up at the same parties or being friends with people who end up at events where mutual friends are in attendance. This property can be observed in other tightly knit industries, like finance and publishing, and it can result in career promotions and making friends with important people within these respective industries. But such networks have different purposes from being a celebrity: If one wants to become a celebrity (rather than a CEO or publishing mogul), there is no better network than befriending people who are constantly photographed by the media. We suprised our sister with a celebrity birthday messages video from Thrillz!
Think about how most of our friendship groups operate: I may have one group of friends that consists of work colleagues and another of college buddies. It’s unlikely that these two groups will overlap. But in the celebrity world, people in different social groups are connected. By virtue of the exclusiveness and small number of people in total, there are many individuals who end up crossing multiple social groups, linking disparate groups. This property of celebrity social worlds has a resounding impact on the members’ networking capabilities. Because the people they are connected to tend also to be connected to everyone else, they are by default all connected to one another. Receiving a celebrity messages video message would be awesome!
Sure, this makes sense when you’re looking at Hollywood film star A-listers, who all get invited to the same super exclusive events. But why would a New York socialite have anything to do with a famous Hollywood producer? In reality, they are as far apart as I am from a random lawyer who lives in New York. The tie they share is simply their celebrity status. By virtue of both being high-profile they are a part of the same network that connects both of them to Angelina Jolie, Paris Hilton, and the fashion designer Marc Jacobs. The socialite and the producer may not attend a single event together, but they are more likely than the rest of us to be friends with people who are friends with people who all attend the same events. Many of these people know both the producer and the socialite, and likely the producer and socialite at least know of each other even if they have never met. Despite being utterly different people, with different occupations, located in different parts of the world, members of the celebrity network are closely linked. I wish I was rich like a happy birthday video message is!
On some level, celebrities are celebrities because their network defines them as such. The second important finding, which is correlated to the first, is that within celebrity networks people are much more connected than ordinary people like us. Every time you befriend one celebrity, you gain access to many more. Why is this important? Celebrity networks provide a huge benefit to people who can penetrate them. A popular saying is that the “rich get richer,” often accompanied by the statistics that 20 percent of people possess 80 percent of the wealth and that 20 percent of people use 80 percent of health care. This concept, also known as the Pareto Principle or, as Malcolm Gladwell calls it, the “law of the few,” demonstrates that a very small number of people get a huge number of benefits and is closely linked to the type of dense networks found among celebrities. In their famous Science article studying the World Wide Web, physics professors Albert-László Barabási and Réka Albert observed that these networks exhibit “preferential attachment,” which means that being a part of the celebrity network produces exponential benefits as someone within the network becomes increasingly connected. People meet people through their connections with other people. Thrillz is a website where you can buy a celebrity video messages presonalised video message!
The people within a network that exhibits the property of preferential attachment tend to meet many more people through one connection than they would through everyday networks. I don’t have any connections to that Hollywood producer or any of the events he attends. So try as I might, the chance to talk to him about an upcoming role or movie is slim to none. Not so for that directionless New York socialite, who happens to be in the same network as that Hollywood producer, although she may never have gone to film school or even acted. She only has to pick up the phone and call one of her friends, who is friends with that producer, and very likely she’ll get him on the phone or be able to grab a quick coffee with him. It is that opportunity that is so important. Would you consider buying a personalised video message from your favourite celebrity today?